7TH CPC ANOMALY- DECISION TO REJECTION OF OPTION 1 IN PENSION FIXATION

7th CPC Anomaly- Decision to Rejection of Option 1 in Pension Fixation Item No 7. Anomaly arising from the decision to reject option ...

7th CPC Anomaly- Decision to Rejection of Option 1 in Pension Fixation

Item No 7.


Anomaly arising from the decision to reject option No. 1 in pension fixation 


The 7 CPC on considering various demands raised by the employees and Pensioners, while rejecting most of them at the instance or opinion tendered by the Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare as also by the Defence Ministry in Para 10.1.67 recommended the following formulation for civilian employees including CAPF personnel who have retired prior to 01.01.2016. 

The Govt in its resolution dated 4th August 2016 made its stand on the recommendation as under:

11.
Revision of Pension of pre 7th CPC retirees  The Commission recommend the following pension formulation for civil employees including CAPF personnel who have retired before 0.1.0.1.20.16(i) All the Civilian personnel including CAPE who retired prior to 01.01.2016 (expected date of implementation of the Seventh CPC recommendations) shall first be fixed in the Pay Matrix being recommended by this Commission, on the basis of the Pay Band and Grade Pay at which they retired, at the minimum of the corresponding level in the matrix. This amount shall be raised, to arrive at the notional pay of the retiree, by adding the number of increments he / she had earned in that level while in service, at the rate of three percent. Fifty percent of the total amount so arrived at shall be the revised pension(ii) The second calculation to be carried out is as follows .The pension, as had been fixed at the time of implementation of the VI CPC recommendations, shall be multiplied by 2.57 to arrive at an alternate value for the revised pension.(iii)Pensioners may be given the option of choosing whichever formulation is beneficial to them. It is recognized that the fixation of pension as per formulation in (i) above may take a little time since the records of each pensioner will have to be checked to ascertain the number of increments earned in the retiring
Both the options recommended by the7th Central Pay Commission as regards pension revision be accepted subject to feasibility of the implementation. Revision of pension using the second option based on fitment factor of 2.57 be implemented immediately. The first option may be made feasible after examination by the Committee comprising Secretary (Pension) as Chairman and Member (Staff). Railway Board, Member (Staff), Department of Posts, Additional Secretary Financial Adviser, Ministry of Home Affairs and Controller General of Accounts as Members

The doubt over the feasibility of implementation of the said recommendations had arisen due to the report tendered by the Secretary (Pension). It was nc doubt an unprecedented step taken by Secretary (Pension). 

The Govt., unfortunately and unethically too, set up a committee under the chairmanship of the same Secretary (Pension) to go into the very matter of feasibility, who had expressed that very doubt at the beginning and prior to the issuance of the resolution. 

The Staff side was provided with an opportunity to represent before the Committee. They had pointed out that it was feasible to implement the recommendation with relevant official records that was supposed to have been kept alive by the Government. The submission made by the Staff side is annexed. On the specious plea that the Service Books were not available in respect of all pensioners, the committee came to the conclusion that the recommendation is not feasible to be implemented. In fact the committee made a random study on the availability of the records and came to the conclusion that of the 101 cases they had taken up, in the case of 86, the relevant records were available. In other words, the Committee itself found that only 14% of the cases the records, i.e. the Service Books will not be able to be traced. The very fact that there are other equally relevant official records from where the requisite information of the number of years of service the pensioner has put in a cadre/Grade/scale of pay etc at the time of retirement was available, was not considered by the Committee. The Committee thus erroneously came to the conclusion that the recommendation is not feasible to be implemented. 

The Committee then went on to suggest an alternative proposal, which was identical to what the 5th CPC had recommended but not acted upon due to huge financial outflow by the then Government. The staff side appreciating the fact that the said recommendation of 5 CPC, if implemented even now will not only benefit the pensioners but also will be capable of removing certain anomalies that might arise if option No 1 is implemented in the case of a few pensioners, suggested that apart from the two options recommended by the 7 CPC, the Committee's suggestion could be considered as 3rd Option. 

The rejection of the suggestion of the staff side and the recommendations of 7 CPC by the Govt regarding option No. 1 on the ground of "infeasibility" is untenable and creates a bad precedent in as much as a Govt Servant or a pensioner is made to suffer financially for the fault of the Govt of not maintaining the requisite official records for verification. For the fault of the Govt not having the records, the pensioners or the employees cannot be punished. The finding that the recommendation is not feasible for implementation is faulted as the committee itself has come to the conclusion that in 84% of the cases, the relevant records are available. The decision amounts to denial of benefit for a vast number of pensioners for the simple reason that in the case of small segment of pensioners the records are stated to be not available. The Committee's findings are also erroneous on the ground that it did not consider whether alternate documents other than Service Books are available from where the claim of the pensioner could be verified. 

From the above, it could be seen that Govt's decision not to implement option No 1 recommended by 7 CPC is flawed and based upon factually erroneous premises and constitutes a clear cut anomaly. The said decision of the Govt requires to be revisited and pensioners given the benefit of option No 1. 

We give a chart indicating the financial loss suffered by pensioners on account of the Govt decision in not implementing the recommendation of 7 CPC concerning option No 1. 

Comparison of Basic Pension - option I vis-a-vis new Formula


Year of retirement
Scale of Pay At the time of retirement
Last Pay Drawn
No. of increments earned in the level
Pension as Per Option-1 Of 7 CPC
Pension as per New formula Dt 12.05.2017
Loss of Account of denial of Option-1
1985
380-12-440-        15-560-20-620
620
16
23400          (Pay Matrix Level -5)
16950 (Table No. 18)
6450
1995
2000-60-2300-75-3200-100-3500
3500
20
32050         (Pay Matrix Level-6)
31100 (Table No. 25)
950
2005
5500-9000
9000
20
32050         (pay matrix level-6)
27600 (Table No. 31)
4450
2006
15600-39100+ GP5400
28470
16
45000         (Pay Matrix Level-10)
37800
8400
2010
9300-34822+ GP 5400
28570
17
43850          (pay Matrix Level-9)
37800
6050

Annexure.

Copy of letter No.NC-JCM-2016/7th CPC (Pension) dated October 17, 2016 addressed to the Secretary /Department of Pension & Pensioners Welfare, Govt, of India, Sardar Patel Bhawan, New Delhi.

Dear Sir,

Sub: 7th CPC recommendation. Pay determination in the case of Pre-2016 pensioners. Option No. 1. Examination of feasibility.

Ref: Minutes of the meeting of the Committee in F.No. 38/37/2016 P&PW(A)Dated 10th October, 2016

We refer to the discussions held on 6.10.2016 in the matter of feasibility of acting upon the 7thy CPC recommendations (Option No. 1) in the matter of pension computation and the minutes circulated under cover of the letter cited. At the outset, we would like to state that the members of the Staff Side, who were associated with the discussions, gained an impression that the Pension Department would not like to implement the recommendation of the 7th CPC concerning Option No. 1 provided to the Pensioners in determination of the revised pension. As has been pointed out by us during the discussions on 6th October, the Government has accepted the said recommendation with a rider of its feasibility of implementation. The attempt, therefore, must be to explore the ways and means of implementing the said recommendation, which benefits a large number of retired personnel, especially those retired prior to 1996. It is, therefore, highly doubtful how any alternate proposal in replacement of the accepted recommendation would be tenable. 

We have the matter considered by various Pensioners Associations as also the Federations of the Serving employees. We enumerate hereunder the feed- back we have receivA: 

Even according to the exercise carried out by the Pension department, only in 18% of the cases, the service Books are reported to have been not available. Conversely it means that in 82% of the cases the records are available to operationalize option No.1. Besides, we find that on the basis of a random scrutiny that only 40% (Percentage varies from Department to Department depending upon the then prevailing career prospects) generally will opt to have pension fixation under the provisiois of option No.1. It will work out to hardly 7% of the cases, where Service Books might not be available. As has been pointed out in the last meeting, Gradation/Seniority list is maintained for each Cadre by the Concerned Department, where the date of promotion to the cadre inter alia is indicated. The said gradation list will reveal many other details viz. the date of birth, date of entry into government service, date of promotion to the present cadre, whether eligible for next promotion, date of superannuation etc. This apart there are several other documents maintained by the Department, which will come in handy for verification of the clam, viz, the pay bills, Establishment files containing promotion orders etc. In other words it is possible to verify the claim of any individual pensioner or family pensioner and take appropriate decision. In other words, there is no infeasibility question at all. It was also pointed out by many organisations that the retention period of Service Books in all major Departments of the Government of India is 5 years after the death of the Pensioner/ Family Pensioner and not 3 years after retirement as indicated by the Official side at the meeting. This apart, it may also be noted that the option has to be exercised by the concerned individual pensioner and he has to m Ike a formal application to the concerned authorities. He is bound to substantiate his claim with documentary proof, whatever that is available with him. 

As was pointed out by some of us in the last meeting, the non- implementation of an accepted recommendation on the specious plea of infeasibility will pave way for plethora of litigation. Apart from the administrative difficulties, the Pension Department would be saddled with if such litigations arise, it would be sad and cruel on the part of the Government to compel the pensioners to bear huge financial burden to pursue their case before the courts of law. 

In view of this the Staff side is of the firm view that the Government issue orders for implementation of Option No. 1 as there is no room for stating that the recommendation is impossible to be implemented for those who are benefited by the said option. 

We are aware that certain anomalies are bound to arise on implementation of option No.1 Anomalies have arisen in the past too. What is needed is to examine those anomalies and ensure that those are genuinely addressed. 

It may be noted that even under the present dispensation, no two Government servants are entitled for the same pension despite they being retired on superannuation from the same grade on the same day. The promotion in lower cadres especially Group B, C and D had been few and far between a decade back in many departments and continues to be the same situation in certain organisations of the Government of India. The vacancy based promotion system, one must admit , operates in a fortuitous manner. For no fault of the individual employee, he/she may retire without getting a promotion whereas his colleague due to sheer luck might get the promotion at the fag end of the career. The case of those employees who retired prior to the advent of ACP or MACP is really pathetic. They had to remain in certain departments in the same cadres for years together. They are in receipt of a paltry amount of pension though there is nothing distinguishable in their service careers for such deprivation. To deny them the benefit provided by the 7th CPC on the specious plea that the relevant records are not available with the Government may not only be unreasonable but also will not stand the test of judicial scrutiny. 

As we have stated in the meeting, the alternative suggestion put forth by the official side is a welcome feature , for it might be a step in the right direction to remove the anomaly pointed out by the Official side when Option No.1 is implemented and will benefit those pensioners who got their promotion at the fag end of their career.. It is also likely to bring about certain extent of parity, if not full, between the old and the present pensioners. However it cannot be in replacement of the recommendation in respect of Option No.1. made by the 7th CPC. The alternate suggestion of the Pension Department may be offered as another option to the pensioners who are not benefited either by Option No. 1 or 2 recommended by the 7th CPC. Such an option will eliminate to a great extent the anomalies that might arise from the implementation of option No. 1. 

In fine, we request that: 

The Pensioners/family pensioners may be allowed to choose any one of the following three options;

(a) 2.57 time of the present pension if that is beneficial.
(b) Option No. 1. Recommended by the 7th CPC, if that is beneficial for them.
( c). to determine the Pension on the basis of the suggestion placed by the Pension Department on 6.10.2016 i.e. extension of the benefit of pension determination recommended by the 5th CPC (viz. arriving at notional pay in the 7th CPC by applying formula for pay revision for serving employees in each Pay Commission and consequent pension fixation) to all pre-2016 Pensioners/family pensioners, if that becomes beneficial to them. 

COMMENTS

Name

29TH SCOVA MEETING,3,30TH SCOVA MEETING,2,3RD PRC,1,5TH PAY COMMISSION,7,6TH PAY COMMISSION,17,7TH CPC,48,7TH CPC ALLOWANCES,142,7TH CPC ARREARS,13,7TH CPC HIGHLIGHTS,1,7TH CPC MEETING,9,7TH CPC MEMORANDUM,2,7TH CPC NEWS,96,7TH CPC NOTIFICATION,128,7TH CPC PENSION CALCULATOR,2,7TH PAY COMMISSION,1237,AADHAAR,27,AADHAAR NUMBER,15,AADHAR CARD,6,AAM AADMI BIMA YOJANA,1,ABOLISH INTERVIEW,6,ABOLISH POSTS,3,ACCIDENTAL DEATH,1,ACCOMMODATION,14,ACCOUNTS CADRE,5,ACCOUNTS OFFICER,6,ACCOUNTS STOCK VERIFIERS,2,ACP,7,ACR,5,AD-HOC APPOINTMENT,1,AD-HOC BONUS,15,ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCE,2,ADDITIONAL HRA,2,ADDITIONAL PAY,1,ADDITIONAL PENSION,8,ADVANCE AGAINST PLB,1,ADVANCE SALARY,2,ADVANCES,11,AFFDF,1,AGE LIMIT,4,AGE RELAXATION,1,AGENCY COMMISSION,1,AIBEA,7,AIBOA,2,AIBOC,3,AICPIN,34,AIDEF,2,AIR FORCE STAFF,11,AIR TICKET,18,AIR TRAVEL,39,AIRF,65,AIS,17,AIS (DCRB) RULES,5,ALLOWANCE COMMITTEE REPORT,2,ALLOWANCES,322,ANNUAL ALLOWANCE,2,ANNUAL REPORT ON PAY & ALLOWANCES,3,ANOMALIES,64,ANOMALY COMMITTEE,45,ANUBHAV,9,APAR,28,APPOINTMENT,6,APPRENTICES,4,APY,6,ARM,1,ARMED FORCES,72,ARMED FORCES PENSIONERS,52,ARMY ORDNANCE CORPS,1,ARMY ORDNANCE CORPS (AOC),3,ARMY STAFF,20,ARREARS,22,ARTISAN STAFF,3,ASO,6,ASSAM RIFLES,1,ATAL PENSION YOJANA,8,ATS,1,AUDIT & ACCOUNT ASSOCIATION,2,AUDIT EMPLOYEES,4,AUTONOMOUS BODIES,33,AYUSH HOSPITALS,2,BACKLOG VACANCIES,1,BANK,29,BANK ACCOUNT,4,BANK BIPARTITE NEWS,23,BANK EMPLOYEES,59,BANK EMPLOYEES NEWS,31,BANK EMPLOYEES WAGE REVISION,30,BANK HOLIDAYS,3,BANK PENSIONERS,5,BANKING FACILITY,1,BASIC SALARY,4,BCA,1,BDPA,1,BEFI,1,BHAVISHYA,6,BIOMETRIC ATTENDANCE,10,BIS,1,BLACK DAY,1,BONUS,70,BONUS ARREAR,1,BONUS CEILING,13,BONUS ORDER 2016,2,BONUS ORDER 2017,13,BPEF,1,BPMS,44,BPS,18,BREAKDOWN ALLOWANCE,1,BSF,1,BSF EMPLOYEES,3,BSNL,12,BSNL EMPLOYEES,6,BSNL PENSIONERS,6,BUDGET,23,BUDGET 2016- 2017,10,BUDGET 2017- 2018,4,BUDGET 2018- 2019,6,CAA,7,CADRE,1,CADRE FIXATION,1,CADRE RESTRUCTURING,30,CADRE REVIEW,24,CANTEEN FACILITIES,12,CAPF,11,CASH HANDLING ALLOWANCE,1,CASTE,3,CASTE CERTIFICATES,2,CASUAL LABOURERS,13,CASUAL LEAVE,4,CASUAL WORKERS,3,CASUALTY PENSION,5,CAT,5,CAT ORDER,5,CBDT ORDERS,8,CBEC,3,CCL,2,CCS,2,CCS (CC&A) RULES,16,CCS (CR) 1964,2,CCS (EOP) RULES,6,CCS (LEAVE) RULES,8,CCS (LTC) RULES 1988,15,CCS (PENSION) RULES 1972,23,CCS (RP) RULES 2008,7,CCS (RP) RULES 2016,33,CDS (RP) RULES 2016,3,CEA,2,CEA FORM,1,CENSUS,1,CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,144,CGA,10,CGDA,46,CGEGIS SCHEME,11,CGEPHIS SCHEME,1,CGHS,70,CGHS AGARTALA,1,CGHS AIZAWL,1,CGHS AREAS,2,CGHS BENEFICIARY,8,CGHS BHOPAL,2,CGHS CARD,4,CGHS CONTRIBUTION,5,CGHS DELHI,1,CGHS HOSPITALS,11,CGHS IMPHAL,1,CGHS PATNA,1,CGHS RATES,8,CGHS RULES,1,CGLE,1,CHARGE SHEET,1,CHARTER OF DEMANDS,70,CHILD CARE LEAVE,10,CHILDREN EDUCATION ALLOWANCE,21,CHILDREN FARE,2,CHS,4,CISF,1,CIVIL ACCOUNTS EMPLOYEE,8,CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES,6,CLERICAL CADRE,5,CMS,1,COMMENTS,1,COMMERCIAL DUTY ALLOWANCE,1,COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT AFTER RETIREMENT,3,COMMITTEE ON 07TH CPC,1,COMMITTEE ON OROP,5,COMMUTED LEAVE,1,COMMUTED PENSION,6,COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT,10,COMPENSATION,4,COMPPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT,16,COMPULSORY RETIREMENT,5,COMPUTER ADVANCE,1,CONCORDANCE TABLES,21,CONDIMENT ALLOWANCE,1,CONFEDERATION,122,CONFERENCE,3,CONTRACT LABOUR,17,CONTRACT WORKERS,7,CONVEYANCE ALLOWANCE,2,COURT CASES,7,COURT ORDER,16,CPAO,68,CPENGRAMS,1,CPF PENSIONERS,6,CPI,23,CPI INDEX,16,CPI- IW,15,CPMF,3,CPSE,35,CPSE EMPLOYEES,31,CS (MA) RULES 1944,5,CSCS,10,CSD,14,CSD CANTEEN FACILITIES,8,CSS,45,CSSS,21,CTG,5,CVO,3,CYCLE MAINTENANCE ALLOWANCE,3,DA,96,DA JANUARY 2016,5,DA JANUARY 2017,5,DA JANUARY 2018,13,DA JULY 2015,1,DA JULY 2016,10,DA JULY 2017,6,DA MERGER,59,DAD PERSONNEL,1,DAILY ALLOWANCE,6,DATA ENTRY OPERATOR,2,DATA PROCESSING ASSISTANTS,1,DATE OF NEXT INCREMENT,4,DE-EMPANELMENT,1,DEARNESS ALLOWANCE,80,DEARNESS RELIEF,31,DEATH BENEFITS,11,DEATH-CUM-RETIREMENT,6,DECEASED EMPLOYEES,4,DECLARATION OF ASSETS & LIABILITIES,5,DEDUCTION,8,DEFENCE,314,DEFENCE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES,30,DEFENCE CIVILIANS,14,DEFENCE EMPLOYEES,177,DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS,5,DEFENCE PENSION,9,DEFENCE PENSIONERS,102,DELEGATION OF POWERS,3,DEPARTMENT CANTEEN,1,DEPARTMENTAL INQUIRIES,4,DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEES,2,DEPENDENTS,1,DEPENDENTS OF DECEASED,5,DEPUTATION,10,DEPUTATION ALLOWANCE,5,DEPUTATION OF EMPLOYEES,5,DEPUTATION ON TENURE ALLOWANCE,1,DEPUTY SECRETARY,5,DESW,40,DHARNA,14,DIABETES,1,DIEM/HALTING ALLOWANCE,1,DIGITAL SIGNED PENSION,4,DIGITALIZATION,2,DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES,1,DISABILITY,36,DISABILITY PENSION,40,DISABLE EMPLOYEE,11,DISABLED CHILDREN,8,DISBURSEMENT OF PENSION,8,DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS,4,DIVORCED DAUGHTER,5,DOCTORS,3,DOMESTIC WORKERS,2,DOP&PW,25,DOPT,324,DOPT 2015,1,DOPT 2016,51,DOPT 2017,97,DOPT 2018,28,DOT,1,DR,37,DRAFTSMAN,4,DRESS ALLOWANCE,10,DSC,2,DUTY HOURS,1,e-NPS,2,E-OFFICE,1,E-PAYMENT,1,E-PENSION,1,E-REVISION,6,ECHS,17,ECHS HOSPITALS,3,ECHS SUBSCRIPTION,2,EDP CADRE,2,ELECTION,6,ELECTION HOLIDAY,1,EMPANELLMENT,11,ENGINEERS,9,EPF,16,EPFO,28,EPS,6,ESIC,8,EX-GRATIA,8,EX-GRATIA COMPENSATION,3,EX-SERVICEMEN,246,EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT,1,EXIT & WITHDRAWAL,4,EXPECTED DA,43,EXPECTED DA BANK EMPLOYEES,2,EXPECTED DA JAN 2017,6,EXPECTED DA JAN 2018,6,EXPECTED DA JULY 2016,1,EXPECTED DA JULY 2017,5,EXPECTED DA JULY 2018,3,EXPECTED DA/DR,7,EXPECTED FAMILY PENSION,3,EXPECTED PENSION,1,EXPENDITURE ALLOCATION,3,EXTENSION,4,EXTENSION EMPANELMENT,1,EXTRA WORK ALLOWANCE,2,FACILITIES TO MP,1,FAMILY PENSION,71,FAMILY PENSIONER,154,FAMILY PLANNING ALLOWANCE,4,FAQ,6,FESTIVAL ADVANCE,3,FIN MIN ORDER,98,FINANCE BUDGET,8,FINANCE COMMISSION,2,FIRE ENGINEE DRIVER,1,FIRE STAFF,1,FISCAL DEFICIT,9,FITMENT FACTOR,53,FIVE DAY WEEK,3,FIXED MONETARY COMPENSATION,1,FLEXI FARE,1,FMA,16,FNPO,1,FOREIGN VISIT,4,FORM 15G & 15H,1,FORM 25,1,FORMS,6,FR 15(A),1,FREEDOM FIGHTER PENSION,5,FULL PENSION,6,FUNDAMENTAL RULES,1,GALLANTRY AWARDS,6,GAZETTE,1,GAZETTE NOTIFICATION,6,GDCE,1,GDS,36,GDS COMMITTEE,9,GDS COMMITTEE REPORT,14,GENERAL POOL,4,GFR,5,GOVERNMENT HOLIDAYS CALENDAR,9,GOVT TOUR,15,GPF,23,GPF (CS) RULES 1960,2,GPF GRIEVANCE,1,GPF WITHDRAWALS,2,GPRA,6,GRADE I,2,GRADE PAY,26,GRADE PAY MERGER,15,GRADE PAY UPGRADATION,8,GRAMIN DAK SEWAKS,38,GRATUITY,17,GRIEVANCES,7,GROUP A,22,GROUP B,12,GROUP C,24,GROUP D,20,GROUP INSURANCE,12,GST,2,GUARANTEE WORK,1,HARD AREA ALLOWANCE,2,HARDSHIP DUTY ALLOWANCE,2,HBA,4,HEALTH & MALARIA ALLOWANCE,1,HEALTH CHECK UP,2,HEALTH INSURANCE SCHEME,1,HEALTH SCHEME,4,HELPER,1,HIERARCHY,10,HIGH ALTITUDE ALLOWANCE,1,HIGH COURT,5,HIGHER QUALIFICATION INCENTIVE,1,HIRING APPRENTICES,1,HIRING STAFF CARS,1,HOLIDAY OVERTIME,1,HOLIDAYS,22,HOLIDAYS 2016,1,HOLIDAYS 2017,3,HOLIDAYS 2018,4,HOLIDAYS FOR YEAR 2016,3,HOME LOAN,1,HONORARIUM,3,HOSTEL ALLOWANCE,7,HOUSE,6,HOUSE ADVANCE,4,HOUSE RENT ALLOWANCE,19,HOUSING LOAN INTEREST,1,HPCA,7,HRA,117,IAF PENSIONERS,1,IAS OFFICERS,9,IBA,13,IBM,1,IDA,4,IDENTITY CARD,5,IESM,2,IFS,1,IMMOVABLE PROPERTY RETURNS,3,IMPLEMENTATION CELL,8,INCENTIVES,4,INCOME TAX,24,INCOME TAX COMPLIANCES,1,INCOME TAX RETURN,4,INCOME TAX RETURNS,1,INCREMENT,20,INDUSTRIAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES,1,INDUSTRIAL TRADES,2,INDUSTRIAL WORKERS,6,INDWF,6,INFLATION,4,INJURY LEAVE,1,INQUIRY,2,INTER CADRE DEPUTATION,7,INTER CADRE TRANSFER,7,INTEREST RATES,17,INTERIM RELIEF,47,INTERIM REPORT,15,IPR,3,IPS OFFICERS,2,IRCTC,4,IRSA,1,IRTSA,14,ISLAND SPECIAL DUTY ALLOWANCE,2,IT EXEMPTION LIMIT,13,J & K GOVT EMPLOYEES,5,JCA,2,JCM,13,JEEVAN PRAMAAN,11,JSA,1,KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN,9,KISAN VIKAS PATRA,1,KVS,13,KVS ADMISSION,2,KVS EMPLOYEES,11,KVS ORDERS,27,LAB TECHNICIAN,3,LABOUR CONFERENCE,5,LABOUR LAWS,8,LARSGESS,3,LAW OFFICERS,1,LDC,4,LDC & UDC,11,LDCE,1,LDCE/GDCE,1,LEAVE,23,LEAVE ENCASHMENT,8,LEAVE RULES,3,LEAVE SALARY,3,LIC,1,LIEUTENANT,1,LIFE CERTIFICATE,26,LIFTING BAN,1,LINK PAY WITH PRODUCTIVITY,2,LOCO & TRAFFIC RUNNING STAFF,1,LOCO INSPECTOR,2,LOCO PILOTS,4,LOK SABHA QUESTIONS,81,LOKPAL & LOKAYUKTAS ACT 2013,3,LTC,55,LTC FARES,3,LTC PROCEDURE,4,MACP,89,MARTYRED SOLDIERS,8,MATERNITY BENEFITS,9,MATERNITY LEAVE,13,MEDICAL,11,MEDICAL ALLOWANCE,3,MEDICAL ASSISTANT,2,MEDICAL INSTITUTES,1,MEDICAL OFFICERS,10,MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT,5,MEDICAL TREATMENT,2,MEDICLAIM,3,MEMORANDUM,3,MEMORANDUM TO 7TH PAY COMMISSION,15,MERGER OF POSTS,4,MES,1,MIDDLE- CLASS PEOPLE,1,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE,1,MILITARY FARMS,1,MINIMUM ENTRY PAY,4,MINIMUM PENSION,34,MINIMUM WAGE,123,MINISTERIAL STAFF,5,MLA,1,MNS,1,MOH&FW,11,MONOTERING,1,MP,5,MSP,10,MTNL,2,NAC,57,NATIONAL COMMISSION,1,NATIONAL HOLIDAY ALLOWANCE,3,NATIONAL PENSION SYSTEM,32,NAVY EMPLOYEES,11,NAVY INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEE,1,NAVY STAFF,8,NCJCMSTAFF,92,NEGP,1,NEW PENSION SCHEME,47,NEW RECRUITERS,3,NEWS,1,NEWSPAPER REIMBURSEMENT,1,NFIR,139,NFPE,9,NFSG,2,NIGHT DUTY ALLOWANCE,14,NITI AAYOG,1,NJCA,12,NODAL OFFICERS,2,NON-MONETARY BENEFITS,1,NON-PRODUCTIVITY LINKED BONUS,4,NOTIFICATION,35,NPA,7,NPS,120,NRMU,3,NURSING ALLOWANCE,3,NURSING PERSONNEL,6,OBC,6,OFB,14,OFFICERS,4,OFFICIAL DUTY,1,OLD PENSION SCHEME,8,ONE RANK ONE PENSION,6,ORDNANCE FACTORY,19,OROP,191,OROP TABLE,4,OVERTIME ALLOWANCE,13,PAID LEAVE,5,PAN,7,PAO,2,PAPER LESS WORK,1,PARAMILITARY FORCES,6,PARLIAMENT ASSISTANT,1,PASSPORT,1,PATERNITY LEAVE,1,PAY ANOMALY,30,PAY BAND,2,PAY COMMISSION,26,PAY COMMISSION MEETING,19,PAY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS,503,PAY COMMISSION REPORT,105,PAY COMMISSION VISIT,6,PAY FIXATION,100,PAY MATRIX,34,PAY SCALE,23,PAY STRUCTURE,23,PBOR,14,PCA,8,PCAFYS,30,PCDA,73,PCDACC,6,PCO ALLOWANCE,1,PENALTY,6,PENSION,338,PENSION ACT,1,PENSION ADALAT,4,PENSION ARREARS,7,PENSION BENEFITS,2,PENSION BILL,2,PENSION CALCULATOR,2,PENSION CASES,15,PENSION CLAIM,1,PENSION DISBURSEMENT,1,PENSION FORMS,1,PENSION GRIEVANCE,10,PENSION PROCEDURE,6,PENSION REVISION,174,PENSION SCHEME,4,PENSIONER PORTAL,47,PENSIONERS,324,PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION,5,PENSIONERS' ASSOCIATION,19,PENURY,2,PERFORMANCE BASED INCREASE,1,PERFORMANCE BASED PAY,6,PERFORMANCE BONUS,2,PERSONAL ASSISTANT,1,PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES,6,PF,8,PF WITHDRAWAL,5,PFRDA,27,PHARMACISTS,10,PIB,15,PLB,34,PMJDY,1,PMVVY,2,PORT & DOCK EMPLOYEES,2,POST 2016 PENSION,1,POST GRADUATE ALLOWANCE,2,POST OFFICE,4,POST- 2006 PENSION,2,POST- 2016 PENSIONERS,7,POSTAL DEPARTMENT,48,POSTAL EMPLOYEES,59,POSTAL ORDERS,50,POSTS,4,POSTS UPGRADATION,10,PPF,7,PPO,25,PRAN,1,PRCP,2,PRE 2016 PENSION,6,PRE- 1990 PENSIONERS,1,PRE- 1996 PENSION,4,PRE- 2006 PENSION,54,PRE- 2006 PENSIONERS,20,PRE- 2016 PENSIONERS,90,PRE- RETIREMENT EMPLOYEES,4,PRE-RETIREMENT COUNSELLING,1,PREMIUM TRAINS,3,PRESS RELEASE,2,PRIVATE AIR TRAVEL,5,PRIVATE SECRETARY,1,PRIVATISATION,1,PROBATION,2,PRODUCTIVITY LINKED BONUS,8,PRODUCTIVITY LINKED REWARD,4,PROFESSIONAL UPDATE ALLOWANCE,1,PROJECT ALLOWANCE,2,PROMOTION,53,PROMOTION POLICY,2,PROMOTION QUOTA,1,PROPERTY RETURNS,7,PROTEST,8,PROVIDENT FUND,28,PROVISIONAL PENSION,5,PRP,3,PSU,10,PUBLIC HOLIDAY,10,QUALIFICATIONS,1,QUALIFYING SERVICE,9,RADIOGRAPHER,1,RAIL BUDGET,2,RAIL FARES,7,RAILWAY,310,RAILWAY BOARD,203,RAILWAY BOARD ORDER,56,RAILWAY EMPLOYEES,361,RAILWAY MEETING,8,RAILWAY PASS,4,RAILWAY PASSES,1,RAILWAY PENSIONERS,24,RAILWAY QUARTER,1,RAILWAY RESERVATION,1,RAILWAY SERVANTS (PASS) RULES,6,RAILWAY TICKETS,5,RANK PARITY,1,RATION MONEY ALLOWANCE,3,RBI,9,RE-EMPLOYED,25,REBATE,1,RECEIPT AND PAYMENT RULES,4,RECOVERY,9,RECOVERY WRONGFUL OR EXCESS PAYMENTS,8,RECRUITMENT,46,RECRUITMENT PROCESS,3,RECRUITMENT RULES,22,REDUCE STAFF,1,REFUND,2,REGULATORY BODIES,1,RELHS,1,RENT DEDUCTION,1,RESEARCH,1,RESERVATION,12,RESERVATION FOR PROMOTION,4,RESERVE CATEGORY,1,RESIGNATION,3,RESTORATION OF PENSION,11,RETIRED DEFENCE CIVILIANS,19,RETIRED DEFENCE PERSONNEL,40,RETIRED EMPLOYEES,40,RETIRED OFFICERS AS INQUIRY OFFICERS,2,RETIRED RAILWAY EMPLOYEES,11,RETIREMENT,14,RETIREMENT ADVISER,1,RETIREMENT AGE,36,RETIREMENT BENEFITS,20,RETIREMENT PLANNING,1,REVISION OF PAY,36,REVOKING SUSPENSION,1,RFD,1,RISK & HARDSHIP,2,RISK & HARDSHIP MATRIX,2,RISK ALLOWANCE,10,ROTATIONAL TRANSFER,6,RPF,3,RS (PENSION) RULES,2,RS (RP) RULES 2008,3,RS (RP) RULES 2016,11,RTI,3,RUNNING ALLOWANCE,1,RUNNING ROOM FACILITIES,1,RUNNING STAFF,15,SAFETY STAFF,5,SALARIED EMPLOYEE,4,SALARY ADVANCE,8,SALARY ARREARS,2,SALARY DISBURSEMENT,5,SALARY HIKE,15,SANKALP,2,SC,9,SCALE FIXATION,1,SCIENTIST NEWS,3,SCOVA,13,SCOVA MEETING,4,SCOVA MEETINGS,12,SCRA,1,SCRAP NPS,14,SDBS,1,SEARCH COMMITTEE,1,SECRETARY,3,SECTION 80DDB,1,SECTION OFFICERS,4,SELF CERTIFICATION,1,SENIOR CITIZEN,11,SENIOR CITIZENS,6,SENIOR CLERK,1,SERVICE BOOK,7,SERVICE MATTER,19,SERVICE RULES,7,SEVENTH PAY COMMISSION,434,SEXUAL HARASSMENT,7,SHORTAGE OF STAFF,3,SHUNTING DUTY ALLOWANCE,1,SITTING FEES,1,SMALL SAVINGS SCHEMES,11,SMALL TAX PAYERS,1,SOLDIERS,9,SPARROW,5,SPECIAL ALLOWANCE,9,SPECIAL CASUAL LEAVE,1,SPECIAL COMPENSATORY (HILL AREA) ALLOWANCE,2,SPECIAL DUTY ALLOWANCE,3,SPECIAL LEAVE,1,SPECIAL PENSION,3,SPECIAL TRAIN CONTROLLER ALLOWANCE,1,SPLIT DUTY ALLOWANCE,1,SPORTS PERSONS,1,SSA,1,ST,4,STAFF BENEFIT FUND,1,STAGNATION,1,STANDARD DEDUCTION,2,STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,49,STATE GOVERNMENT PENSIONERS,12,STENOGRAPHERS,8,STEPPING UP OF PAY,2,STIPEND,3,STOP PRIVATIZATION,1,STORE KEEPING STAFF,2,STORE PHARMACIST,2,STRIKE,65,SUKANYA SAMRIDDHI ACCOUNT,5,SUMPTUARY ALLOWANCE,3,SUPERANNUATION,12,SUPERVISOR,12,SUPREME COURT,6,SUSPENSION,4,SUSPENSION HOSPITALS,3,SWEEPERS,1,SWITCHING OVER 6TH PAY COMMISSION,1,TA CLAIMS,2,TA RULES,11,TAX BENEFITS,4,TAX RATES,2,TAX RELIEF,4,TDS,1,TEACHERS,4,TEACHERS NEWS,2,TEACHING STAFF,3,TECHNICAL RESIGNATION,1,TECHNICIAN,2,TELEPHONE FACILITIES,1,TENURE ALLOWANCE,3,TERMS OF REFERENCE OF 7TH PAY COMMISSION,5,TERRITORIAL ARMY ALLOWANCE,1,THIRD PAY REVISION COMMITTEE,6,TOUGH LOCATION ALLOWANCE,4,TRACK MAINTAINERS,3,TRACKMEN,2,TRAINEES,2,TRAINING,9,TRAINING ALLOWANCE,3,TRAINS,2,TRANSFER,20,TRANSFER POLICY,18,TRANSPORT ALLOWANCE,26,TRAVELLING,5,TRAVELLING ALLOWANCE,31,TRIP ALLOWANCE,1,UDC,3,UFBU,3,UGC,3,UNIFORM,1,UNIFORM ALLOWANCE,6,UNMARRIED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,1,UPSC,1,URC,4,VACANCY,8,VACATION,1,VIGILANCE CLEARANCE,1,VOLUNTARY RETIERMENT SCHEME,6,VPBY,1,VRS,3,VRS SCHEME,2,WAGE HIKE,23,WAR INJURY PENSION,7,WASHING ALLOWANCE,5,WELFARE FACILITIES,9,WITHDRAWAL HOSPITALS,1,WOMEN EMPLOYEES,14,WORKING DAYS,1,WORKING HOURS,4,WORKSHOP,2,X BP SETTLEMENT,4,XI BP SETTLEMENT,15,YOGA,1,सातवाँ वेतन आयोग,6,
ltr
item
CENTRAL GOVT EMPLOYEES & PENSIONERS NEWS: 7TH CPC ANOMALY- DECISION TO REJECTION OF OPTION 1 IN PENSION FIXATION
7TH CPC ANOMALY- DECISION TO REJECTION OF OPTION 1 IN PENSION FIXATION
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-rPoWJ51ozDQ/Wa1cybsNEPI/AAAAAAAAHw0/L4FpuZWkBlEMc0lcOi65OxwuCzrxjOVqgCLcBGAs/s320/Item%2BNo.%2B07-%2B7TH%2BCPC%2BANOMALY-%2BDECISION%2BTO%2BREJECTION%2BOF%2BOPTION%2B1%2BIN%2BPENSION%2BFIXATION_04.09.2017.png
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-rPoWJ51ozDQ/Wa1cybsNEPI/AAAAAAAAHw0/L4FpuZWkBlEMc0lcOi65OxwuCzrxjOVqgCLcBGAs/s72-c/Item%2BNo.%2B07-%2B7TH%2BCPC%2BANOMALY-%2BDECISION%2BTO%2BREJECTION%2BOF%2BOPTION%2B1%2BIN%2BPENSION%2BFIXATION_04.09.2017.png
CENTRAL GOVT EMPLOYEES & PENSIONERS NEWS
http://www.paycommissions.in/2017/09/7th-cpc-anomaly-decision-to-rejection-of-option-1-in-pension-fixation.html
http://www.paycommissions.in/
http://www.paycommissions.in/
http://www.paycommissions.in/2017/09/7th-cpc-anomaly-decision-to-rejection-of-option-1-in-pension-fixation.html
true
1672749554628866771
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy